Get ASMBS 2022 OnDemand Now! Learn More about OnDemand

Background

To explore the relationship between preoperative Hill Grade and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) outcomes two years after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Methods

All patients (n=275) undergoing SG performed by 3 surgeons at a single academic institution from June 2018 to August 2019 were included. Complete datasets were available for 134 patients which were incorporated in analyses. Patients with preoperative Hill Grade I-II (Group1;n=90) were compared to those with Grade III-IV (Group2;n=44). Univariable analyses were conducted for potential associations between Hill Grade and GERD outcomes.

Results

Baseline demographics, weight, obesity-associated diseases including GERD (33.33%vs. 45.45%;p=1747), and follow-up length were similar between groups. Hiatal hernia (HH) was more common in Group2 (61.36%vs.14.44%;p<0.0001). HH repair (HHR) at index SG occurred more frequently in Group2 (31.82%vs.8.89%;p=0.0008). Change in body mass index did not vary between groups (-12.52+-6.91vs.-13.15+-5.87kg/m2;p=0.5762). At two-year follow-up, the percentages of patients who had GERD (53.33%vs.70.45%;p=0.0595), remained GERD free (55.00%vs.45.83%;p=0.4498), had resolution of GERD (30.00%vs.10.00%;p=0.0978), experienced persistent GERD (66.67%vs.85.00%;p=0.1518), or suffered from de novo GERD (46.67%vs.58.33%;p=0.3372) did not statistically differ between Group1 and Group2. Two patients in Group1 and one in Group2 underwent additional operative intervention for GERD refractory to medical therapy (2.22%vs.2.27%;p=0.9854).

Conclusions

This is the first study assessing the impact of Hill Grade on GERD after SG. Univariable analyses of this small sample did not show a statistically significant difference in postoperative GERD outcomes between patients with preoperative Hill Grade I-II and those with Grade III-IV. Larger-sample studies allowing more robust analyses accounting for the impact of HHR are needed.